Loading...
Reso 0647-12/1982 Resolution 647 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REPRESENTATION BY COUNTY COUNSEL AND AGREEMENT TO STIPULATE TO JUDGEMENT DROGIN v BOARD OF SUPERVISORS On motion of Director Holm seconded by Director Newport, the following resolution is adopted. WHEREAS, the SAN MARCOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT has been named as a defendant and has been served with summons and complaint in a suit entitled Drogin v Board of Supervisors, Superior Count No. 488448, in which plaintiffs therein, taxpayers of the County of San Diego seek a judgement declaring taxpayers' rights under a resolution of the Board of Supervisors of April 14, 1982, transferring possessory interests from the unsecured roll to the secured roll for the 1978-79 fiscal year and ordering a refund of taxes brought about by that transfer; and WHEREAS, the Auditor and Controller, as authorized by Government COde Section 26906.1 and Education Code Section 14240 has impounded these collected revenues in dispute and they have not distributed to the districts/board/ agency; and WHEREAS, County Counsel, on authorization from the Board of Supervisors will represent this district/board/agency without fee on condition that this district/board/agency agrees to stipulate to a judgment that said transfer is valid and agree to refund of any taxes accruing to this district/board/agency, occasioned by this transfer; and WHEREAS, this board is agreeable to such representation on those conditions; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED that County Counsel of San Diego County may represent SAN MARCOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT in that suit entitled Drogin v Board of Supervisors, San Diego County Superior Court No.488448, and that as a condition of this representation this district/board /agency agrees that County Counsel on behalf of this district board/agency, may stipulate to a judgement as prayed for in said lawsuit declaring that the Board of Supervisors has authority and discretion under Section 107 subdivision (b) of the Revenue and Taxation Code to (i) determine that the value of possessory interests in land located in San Diego County on the 1978 lien date, was sufficient security for the payment of any taxes levied thereon and (ii) unconditionally order the placement of those possessory interests on the secured property tax roll and (iii) unconditionally order a refund of the Supplemental 1978-79 Property Taxes (the supplemental unsecured property tax revenue) collected by the County, or if not collected to cancel such tax liability, in the manner and as done in that resolution of the Board of Resolution Number 647 Supervisors of San Diego County adopted April 14, 1982 (No. 17), a copy of which was included as an attachment to the complaint served in the Drogin case, without the necessity of any taxpayer satisfying the conditions as also set forth in that resolution, of posting security for the refund or obyaining a final judicial determination of the validity of such refund. This district/board/agency further claims being filed, if the Ccounty so determines, any amounts of the 1978-79 supplemental unsecrued property tax revenue collected by the County and accuring to this district/board/agency, or if said amounts have not been collected to cancel the tax liability therefore. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the SAN MARCOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT held on December 6, 1982, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors: Newport, Mason, Holm, Ferguson, Mahr NOES: Directors: None ABSTAIN: Directors: None ABSENT: Directors: None ATTEST: County Wa~~er°c~~arcOs