Reso 0435-08/1976 RESOLUTION NO. 435
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
SAN MARCOS COUNTY WATER DISTRICT APPROVING
MODIFICATIONS IN PROJECT APPROVAL
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the San Marcos County
Water District has previously approved the Project Report, EIR and
Financial Plan and Revenue Program for the Phase III Enlargement and
Upgrading of the Encina Water Pollution Control Facilities ("Project")
and
The Board of Directors of the San Marcos County Water
District believes that certain modifications in said project as so
approved are appropriate.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Directors
of the San Marcos County Water District, as follows:
Section 1. The modifications in the project as reflected
in the draft letter to Mr. Charles B. Oldsen of the County of San
Diego from Larry F. Walker of the State Water Resources Control Board,
a copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "B" and incorporated
herein as if set forth in'full, including reduction in capacity re-
sulting from said project from 18 MGD to 13.75 MGD, are hereby approved
substantially in the form set forth in said letter.
Section 2. Although said project is hereby modified to result
in a capacity of 13.75 MGD, the plans and specifications therefor shall
be prepared to accord with the 18 MGD project originally proposed in
order to be in a position to construct same if and when there is compli-
ance with CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION 2.b., 2.c., or 2.d. set forth in
said Exhibit "B".
Section 3. The Vista Sanitation District and all staff
persons thereof and of the San Marcos County Water District are auth-
orized and directed to take all necessary and appropriate steps and
actions to pursue and complete said project as provided for herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the San Marcos
County Water District at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of August
1976, by the following roll call vote:
-1-
Resolution No. 435
AYES: Directors: Michel, Vanderbeck, Dow, Mahr
and Blanchard
NOES: Directors: None
ABSTAIN: Directors: None
ABSENT: Directors: None
of San Ma?r~os County Water District
-2-
f'J ~ t;o; $10~ '
Hr, charles B · o!ds~;n
cour, ty of
~cpar~me~ of 5~n~ation'
and Fload' Con~ol, County
~eratiOn~ Center
5555
S~,n Diego, ~ 92123
~CI~. jOi~T P~R$, ~P~ECT N0. i0i~ F,Y. !974-75, CO~CE~
APg~Z~ '.
T~is of~ic~ has revi~d ~he P~Jec~- ~epo~ dated Fe~--~y, 1975
apSeyes ~he ~encept of c~n~tr~ct~ Ph~ ~II enl~ge~eat ~d .
MGD, ' '
5ZGI~T-~ PR~ECT B~ : ·
Th8 fol!$~ing items will
.... . -..... -.. . .=~ : :., -. -.- - ., ... -
MOb~li~a~ n/d =Obiliza~iOn " '
- ~ o e - - -
" all inco~!ng flo~s tO he diverted to a co~u~ inf!uen~ "
FU~ab!e capamity. of
A n<~w ae=a~d g=it removal tank~ Fund~!e capacity of 13,55
DIGD AE~- A new pumping facility, -Pund~bie c~aClty of 2&.54 MGD
" EXhibit "B"
5, Primary s~.dimcntaticn t-~yk modifica~l_.o~..
R'~place exi~;~ing efflu.~-nt troughs with P.d~merged eE~luent
~aunders, M~ii~r~kion o~ existin~ longitudinal collsctor~
to eliminate th~ re~n flighZ e~i~ing f~atur~, ~o ba "
r~plaCed ~ith a low ~r~=ssu~e ~i~
Of !3~55 N~ AD~T,
~or control facilities ~ur hcBdworka, p~im~y
7. ~Co~ered_bi6filterS
9, Secona~y se~ment~i~n t~s .I' . .
,0. Chlorine Storage ~ild~g m~d equi~(:n~' .
13. Adm~n~ati0n and !~orato~' b~iding ~ca!~ication~. : -.. .
14, operations.center ino!Ud~ng ~an~ Generator
16, E~hwork ~nd sit~ ~mnTovem~nts. ' '
beds. -
' 1~, Chiorination/deCh~ina~ion fa=i!i~i~;s."'
~8, Di~s~er addi=iun.
19.' Revision~ te existing ~iges~e:s inclu~ng ga~ ~an~gem~nt sy:~tem-
20. Cen~l~ building ~d new
21. F~O~ control Channel
~/~-' [ E~t~a~ed consZru~iO~ cost is $18,417 00$. E~tima~od eligibl&
~- uo~ is $17.007,000,
-.-~ .
-..v' Exhibit "B"
. p.j, '.'.
,~:-:~. : .
· CO~%~iTIONS O? COnCePT APPROVAL:
ReC~ip~ of th~ complete p!~a ~n~ 'z~cific~tions by the dated
spBcifi~ b~low. ~.I~ th~ p!~nz; PI~d ~;pecificakion~ ~e not
semitrod by t~i~ date, conzest aDDrov~ may bu with~;~:
EdS~UCTiDNS PERTA!N~G To '!~ P~P~Ti0N 0F FINAL P~S F~D
S~EGiFICATi0~S:
Concept ~pp~OVa! is no~ ~ authorization to proceed with -.
~rep~ration of fin~l pi~B and $~ciiications. .~ executed S~ep 2
b inzurrDd. The unde~a~ing of ~y Step 2 work ~for{~ ~be execu-
~ter ~he Step 2 grit is mad~ ~nd de~i~ work has been stated,
~he in~mation outlined ~1o~ should ha m~bmitted in some f~ng
(desi~ ~awing~, d~ign notes, calcu!a~ions, flow schematicS, etc.
either by ms~tings wi~h o~ staf~ or in a ~ritton fOrma~ (pre~er~ly)-
W~ a~ not Concerned so much wi-~h th~ ~or~ O~ these "in progress" .
re~ew~ .as ~e ~e with th~ ~c~. ~n~t ~h~v ~'e accomolishBd
info~ation debir~d i~ aS ~ollows: ..- ..
1. At the estimated I0 ~rcenk d~aig~x completion level, the - "'
:~ubmi:;~;i~n should inc!u~, as a minimum, proC~:s ~ch~matics,
~!naliz~d desi~ criteria with SUp~r~ing calculations ' .-
reg~ding process sit $iZlnGe su!i~ balance sheet, and -
proposed service building flc~r p!~s de!inea~ing ~mun~ions-
2- At {~out the 50 ~rcent compis~ion point, th~ submission
should include avail~hle desi~ ~-~in~s, pumping ~d piping
diagrams ~d sup~rrin~ d~sign caicuia~icns. The
~ed archit~ct~=al desi~ ~awing~ sh0~ld also be
Addi~ionaily, only ~h8 m~chanic~l P~=~!O~ o~ the "~t"
s~ifica~ions (0,9-, pumpS, blowers, e~} should b~ .-~
to diSCuss: ~ny mahters. For Eurtb~r inlormB~ion and fOE m~ilin~ ..
arrangements for $~mit~ala, please cont~ck Tom Korp~lski or
aok~ Herten 0f th~ FaCilities ~4~i~n Section'at (915) 322--305E' .
or 322~4287. .
U~n co~!e~lon of final plans ~nd s~ific~ions, th~ Eollo~ing "--
i- ~o si~d sDt~ of the final plans ~d s~ifica~ions.
2. ~o copies of comp!~te ~ration & M~ntsnance M~nua! in
~aft form.
"'~ ~ Exhibit "B"
(~_,~lin~ of proposed Ins~ruckion~! -~rO~ram in conformshue
wi~h S~a~ guidelines,
s~ci!ica~ions, ins~tion, soil t~sting, etc,), O & M H~u~],
Revenue ~o~r~, and O~h~
E~ceipt ~d approval, ~h~ S~a~'Wi!l certify the elig~le
· o ~he EPA for a Fede~a!
~DiTiON~ n~TiON ~ ~~TS ~EDED ~RiOR TO CERTiFICATION~
s~mitted ~nd ~proved p~iO~ t~ prO~¢t ~er~ification:
application and supporting doc~n~s c~nnot be
CONDI~'I~N~ OF C~TIFiCATiOM~ '
In adaPtion to m~y stand~d pro-~isien$,. the. St~t~ ~d EPA ~i!l
place ~he following s~ci~ conditions on ~b~ 'prOject. cerhific~tion
or m~y ~ts that m~ght be aw~ded on this project:
regiona~ facility p~ovlding ~er~ice on a ~i~i~ ~nd e~a!t~hle
basis ~nd in aecord~c~ with guidelines ~d regulations
~oj~c~ Re~r~ of F~b~ry 1975, .
. ... ....
.2, G~t~= a~rces that no f~cilitius will be added to
~astewater treatment planh exceph as approVed by this
- approval letter ~nd covered by [edeI ai '~t Ageemen~
June 30, 1980, un!css: . -
a, Approved in ~itinU by the EPA ~d SWRCB, or
b, ~ Air Q~ali~y Mainken~ce Plan covering the projsct
service ~ea ia d~velo~d ~d ap~oue~ by the i~ir
BO~d ~d the EPA that ¢Ompli~ce with NatiOna~ ~bient
Air Q~li,ty 3tm~da~ds has b~n attained, or
"'~ = E~ibit "B" ....
d. The v:ork plan as outlined in the resolution of the
Joint Advisory Committee of the Encina Joint Se:.;erage
System and executed on September 2~, 1975 is completed
and implemented.
Compliance ~th special conditions 2.b, 2.c, or 2.d prior
to June 30, 1980 will permit the Grantee to enlarge the
capacity (ADWF) of the treatment works to a capacity of
18 MGD '
3- Grantee agrees to provide reasonable assistance, information
and data ~ithin its statutory authority for the development
'of'anAir Quality Maintenance Plan. .. '
~. Grantee agrees to implement the mitigation measures outlined
in the Environmental Impact Report.
5- Grantee agrees to prepare a literature overview of the service
.area of cultural properties whose scope is sufficiently
detailed to identify those properties which are known and
eligible for the' National Register. For such properties,
identify those impacts which ~ill occur in the %tea of
potential envirommental impact", and possible measures which
might be taken to minimize these impacts. .
This concept approval includes only thab project described above
and does not include any associated projects which may have been
refei~ed to in the Project Report and does not guarantee grant
funding on any subsequent project which may be necessary to assure
that the approved project is functionai.
Should you have any questions, please contact Lynn Johnson, the
State Evaluator, assigned to your project at (916) 322-5638.
Larry F. Walker
Division Chief
Manager - Clean Water Grs_ut Program
cc: CRWQCB, San Diego Region (9)
Environmental Protection Agency
Region IX
Exhibit "B"